Trump’s Energy Storage Challenge Feeds Flow Battery Fire


Oh the irony, it burns. Former President Trump touted himself as the savior of US coal miners, but all throughout his tenure the US Department of Energy was setting the stage for global decarbonization. In the latest illustration of the deep state at work, DOE has deployed the 2020 Energy Storage Grand Challenge to pump $20 million into scaling up the nation’s flow battery manufacturing and supply chain.

Flow Batteries & The Energy Storage Grand Challenge

The Energy Storage Grand Challenge launched with $153 million in funding back in January 2020, just a few weeks after Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette was tapped to helm the agency. Apparently Brouillette did not get the memo about saving coal jobs, because he enthusiastically announced the new $153 million battery initiative at one of the most high profile media events in technology circles, CES 2020 in Las Vegas.

DOE billed the Energy Storage Challenge as “a comprehensive program to accelerate the development, commercialization, and utilization of next-generation energy storage technologies and sustain American global leadership in energy storage.”

Left unsaid was the part where energy storage kills coal, gas, and oil by suctioning more wind and solar power into the nation’s power generation landscape.

Brouillette’s turn at the wheel ended when President Biden took office, but the Energy Storage Grand Challenge has continued to ripple seamlessly through the agency under the stewardship of newly minted Energy Secretary Jennifer M. Granholm.

Evidently, flow batteries made the cut. Drawing from a roadmap developed through the Energy Storage Challenge, DOE is determined to scale up flow battery manufacturing. It announced the new $20 million flow battery initiative last week through its Advanced Manufacturing Office.

“To help the U.S. lead the way in developing and supplying energy storage, the DOE launched the Energy Storage Grand Challenge (ESGC) and released the ESGC Roadmap, informed by feedback and comments from the energy storage community,” DOE explained, adding that “the Department is deploying its extensive resources and expertise to address the technology development, commercialization, manufacturing, valuation, and workforce challenges to position the U.S. for global leadership in energy storage technologies of the future.”

“By investing in American-made, clean-energy technologies, the Department of Energy is harnessing our country’s innovative spirit to build an equitable and sustainable energy system,” Granholm emphasized.

US DOE Hearts Flow Batteries For Grid-Scale Energy Storage

The technology behind flow batteries is simple. When two specially formulated liquids flow adjacent to each other, they generate electricity. The rest is merely a matter of tanks, pumps, and a membrane to keep the two liquids separated (or not, as the case may be).

Electric vehicle stakeholders were eyeballing flow batteries at one point, but the main target is stationary energy storage.

As for why lithium-ion batteries don’t do the trick, they do. They just don’t do enough to facilitate rapid decarbonization. Lithium-ion energy storage is sufficient for many use cases, but DOE is aiming for scale and duration.

For all the hoopla over the latest lithium-ion technology, good old fashioned pumped hydropower still provides 97% of storage capacity in the US today. New battery technology is needed in order to meet the growing demand.

To put some perspective on the challenge of finding another bulk storage technology outside of pumped hydro, as of 2018 the US barely scraped 870 megawatt-hours in battery-type capacity. DOE projects that the demand for battery energy storage (meaning outside of pumped hydro) will top 300 gigawatt-hours by 2030.

DOE has been pouring R&D dollars into all kinds of bulk systems, and it is especially excited about flow batteries.

“The unique architecture of flow batteries, consisting of electrochemical cell stacks, storage tanks, and flow systems, make it possible to decouple power and energy, offering great system flexibility (i.e., simplifying the adjustment of the system size to meet the ever-changing demands),” they enthuse. Among the benefits they list:

  • Flow batteries last a really long time. They can cycle more than 10,000 times in 20 years.
  • They can fit a lot of different use cases because they are modular and easily scaled.
  • Safety risks are lower than for other types of energy storage.
  • To gild the green lily, the liquid in flow batteries could be based on iron sulfate or other byproducts of steel making, which supports the supply chain sustainability goal and the circular economy.

So, What’s The Problem?

The Energy Department is satisfied with the readiness state of flow battery technology, but there being no such thing as a free lunch, problems persist in the area of manufacturing readiness.

“The ability to manufacture flow battery systems of sufficient size is required in order to meet the expected demand for stationary grid storage,” it explains. “The current sizes of flow battery cells, in which the most advanced materials and components have been demonstrated, are orders of magnitude below system sizes relevant for commercial use.”

“…there is a need for production facilities capable of manufacturing large volumes of electrolytes and corresponding large sized battery system components to provide the capacity to meet the projected energy storage demand,” it adds.

Flow battery companies that aim to get a slice of that $20 million funding pie will have their work cut out for them. They have to come up with projects that demonstrate cost-effective scale-up, for starters. They also have to produce a prototype using scaled-up processes, and they have to partner with the flow battery manufacturing supply chain to give the whole manufacturing ecosystem a boost.

Wide Net For Next-Generation Energy Storage

Vanadium (not vibranium) is currently the basis for a lot of flow battery activity, but the new round of funding casts a wide net. In no particular order, here are some developments that recently crossed the CleanTechnica radar. Don’t be surprised if these names pop up when the topic turns to scaling up flow battery manufacturing in the U.S. and globally.

The Energy Department and the US Department of Defense are interested in the firm ESS (aka Energy Storage Solutions), which has come up with an all-iron flow battery formula. Their scalable solution can last from 6 to 16 hours, depending on need.

Last year, the Bill Gates startup Form Energy started work on a flow battery project in Minnesota, deploying technology CleanTechnica described as “unconventional.” The aim is a discharge cycle of 150 hours.

Over in Scotland, UK-based Invinity Energy Systems has hooked its vanadium flow battery up with a tidal energy system aimed at producing green hydrogen, which is itself another form of energy storage.

One big deal to keep an eye on is a mashup between the global giant Chemours Chemical and the flow battery firm UET, aimed at making a Chemours membrane into an industry standard.

Meanwhile, a research team at Harvard has been hammering away at a next generation flow battery based on quinone molecules with an assist from the DOE’s cutting edge funding office, ARPA-E, so keep an eye on that.

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey.

Image credit: ARPA-E courtesy of Harvard University.


 



 


Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

New Podcast: Forecasting EV Sales And EV Battery & Metal Prices — Interview with BloombergNEF’s Head of Clean Power Research





Source link